Право и управление2224-913310.24412/2224-9133-2026-5-89-93OtherКОНЦЕПЦИЯ СОГЛАСИЯ В ПРАВЕ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ДОГОВОРОВ: ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ ОСНОВАНИЯ И ПРЕДЕЛЫ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯCONSENT IN THE LAW OF TREATIES: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND LIMITS OF APPLICATIONЛогиноваЕкатерина ЮрьевнаLoginovaEkaterina Yurievnaekatlog2004@yandex.ru4th year student Faculty of International Law, Federal State Autonomous Educational, Institution of Higher Education, “Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation”студентка 4 курса Международно-правового факультета, Федерального государственного автономного, образовательного учреждения высшего образования, «Московский государственный институт, международных отношений (университет), Министерства иностранных дел Российской Федерации»01012026589932305202619062026

Статья посвящена критическому анализу концепции согласия в праве международ ныхдоговоров. Рассматривается соотношение формальных процедур выражения согласия, закре пленных в Венской конвенции 1969 года, и действительной воли государств-участников. Особое внимание уделяется проблемам толкования международных договоров, определению оснований недей ствительности согласия и научным дискуссиям вокруг расширительного понимания экономического и политического принуждения

The article provides a critical analysis of the concept of consent in the law of treaties. Itexamines the correlation between the formal procedures for expressing consent established by the 1969 Vienna Convention and the actual will of the participating states. Particular attention is given to the issues of treaty interpretation, the identification of grounds for the invalidity of consent, and the academic discourse surrounding a broader understanding of economic and political coercion. Ultimately, the study emphasizes that the international legal system is founded on the principle of legal equality, and the factual asymmetry of the parties does not, in itself, constitute a defect of consent

согласиеправо международных договоровВенская конвенцияволеизъяв лениепринуждениетолкование договоровсогласование вольнедействительность договоровconsentlaw of treatiesVienna Conventionexpression of willcoerciontreaty interpretationcoordination of willsinvalidity of treatiesTunkin, G. I. Theory of International Law. Moscow: Zertsalo, 2000, 416 p.Тункин Г. И. Теория международного права. – М.: Зерцало, 2000. – 416 с.Langstrцm, A. Russia in Transition: The Evolution of International Legal Doctrines. A Compara tive Analysis of the Textbooks “International Law” edited by G. I. Tunkin (1982) and edited by Yu. M. Kolosov and V. I. Kuznetsov (1995) // Moscow Jour nal of International Law. 2021, pp. 202-235.Лангстрём А. Россия в переходный период: эволюция международно-правовых доктрин. Сравнительный анализ учебников «Между народное право» под ред. Г. И. Тункина (1982) и под ред. Ю. М. Колосова и В. И. Кузнецова (1995) // Московский журнал международного права. 2021. C. 202-235.Villiger, M. E. Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers / Brill, 2009, 1093 p.Villiger M. E. Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers / Brill, 2009. 1093 p.Mortenson J. D. The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History? // American Journal of International Law (AJIL). 2013. Vol. 107. P. 780-822.Mortenson J. D. The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History? // American Journal of International Law (AJIL). 2013. Vol. 107. P. 780-822.Yee S. Notes on the International Court of Justice (Part 6) - The Fourth Use of Travaux Prйpara toires in the LaGrand Case: To Prove the Non-preclu sion of an Interpretation // Chinese Journal of Inter national Law. 2017. Vol. 16, no. 2. P. 351-365.Yee S. Notes on the International Court of Justice (Part 6) — The Fourth Use of Travaux Prйparatoires in the LaGrand Case: To Prove the 93 ПРАВО и УПРАВЛЕНИЕ - № 5 - 2026 Non-preclusion of an Interpretation // Chinese Journal of International Law. 2017. Vol. 16, no. 2. P. 351-365.Draft conclusions on subsequent agree ments and subsequent practice in relation to the interpretation of treaties, with commentaries / Inter national LawCommission (ILC). 2018. 102 p.Draft conclusions on subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation to the interpretation of treaties, with commentaries / International LawCommission (ILC). 2018. 102 p.Daillier P., Forteau M., Pellet A. Droit interna tional public. 8th ed. Paris: LGDJ, 2009. 1709 p.Daillier P., Forteau M., Pellet A. Droit international public. 8th ed. Paris: LGDJ, 2009. 1709 p.Judgment of 2 February 2018 (Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and Boundary in the Northern Part of Isla Portillos (Costa Rica v. Nicara gua)) // I.C.J. Reports. 2018.Judgment of 2 February 2018 (Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and Boundary in the Northern Part of Isla Portillos (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)) // I.C.J. Reports. 2018.McRae P. The Search for Meaning: Continu ingProblems with the Interpretation of Treaties. 2002. P. 209-260.McRae P. The Search for Meaning: Continuing Problems with the Interpretation of Treaties. 2002. P. 209-260.The Effect of the Passage of Time on the Interpretation of Treaties // Leiden Journal of Interna tional Law. 2011. P. 201-222.The Effect of the Passage of Time on the Interpretation of Treaties // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2011. P. 201-222.Case Concerning the Gabčнkovo–Nagy maros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) // International LawReports. 2000. Vol. 116.Case Concerning the Gabčнkovo– Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) // International LawReports. 2000. Vol. 116.The Vienna Convention on the Law of Trea ties: Declaration on the Prohibition of Military, Politi cal or Economic Coercion in the Conclusion of Trea ties // Oxford Commentary on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. 31 p.The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: Declaration on the Prohibition of Military, Political or Economic Coercion in the Conclusion of Treaties // Oxford Commentary on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. 31 p.The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary / ed. by O. Corten et al. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. (Oxford Commentaries on International Law). P. 898-903.The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary / ed. by O. Corten et al. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. (Oxford Commentaries on International Law). P. 898-903.Crawford J. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 785 p.Crawford J. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 785 p.Bвli A. Weapons Against the Weak: Inter national Law and the Political Economy of Coercion. [S. l.], 2024.Bвli A. Weapons Against the Weak: International Law and the Political Economy of Coercion. [S. l.], 2024.Batinga J. Economic Coercion and the Evolving Interpretation of the Use of Force: Economic Coercion and the Evolving Interpretation of Article 2(4) // Wisconsin International LawJournal. 2024. Vol. 41, no. 2.Batinga J. Economic Coercion and the Evolving Interpretation of the Use of Force: Economic Coercion and the Evolving Interpretation of Article 2(4) // Wisconsin International LawJournal. 2024. Vol. 41, no. 2.