<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Право и управление</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2224-9133</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24412/2224-9133-2026-1-311-315</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Other</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">ОТЛИЧИЕ УКРЫВАТЕЛЬСТВА ПРЕСТУПЛЕНИЯ ОТ НЕСООБЩЕНИЯ О НЕМ: ВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИ И ПРАВОПРИМЕНЕНИЯ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONCEALING A CRIME AND NOT REPORTING IT: ISSUES OF THEORY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дворжицкая</surname><given-names>Марина Андреевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dvorzhitskaya</surname><given-names>Marina Andreevna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><email>dvorzhickaya91@mail.ru</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">PhD in Law, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Criminal Law, of the Northwestern Branch of the Lebedev Russian State, University of Justice</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">кандидат юридических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры уголовного права, Северо-западного филиала ФГБОУ ВО, «Российский государственный университет правосудия, имени В.М. Лебедева»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-01"><day>01</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><fpage>311</fpage><lpage>315</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-01-15"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-02-25"><day>25</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></date></history><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="publication-48082ff9-e2d5-43cf-8b3c-33790412224e.pdf" xlink:title="PDF"/><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В данной статье исследуется проблема разграничения несообщения о преступлении и заранее не обещанного укрывательства преступлений. Автор анализирует критерии, позволяющие провести различие между этими преступлениями, а также их соотношение друг с другом. Проведенная уголовно-правовая характеристика заранее не обещанного укрывательства преступления и несообще ния о нем, позволила сделать вывод о том, что этисоставы имеют, как схожие, так и отличительные характеристики. Ключевые отличия выражаются в том, что укрывательство – это действие, несообще ние – это бездействие, когда у лица имеется обязанность и возможность сообщить о преступлении. На основе исторического опыта и мнений учёных формулируется правило квалификации преступлений, которое заключается в том, что если несообщение о преступлении и заранее не обещанное укрыва тельство преступления имеют место одновременно и касаются особо тяжкого преступления, входяще го в перечень деяний, описанных в диспозиции статьи 205.6 УК РФ, тотакие действия должны быть квалифицированы по статье 316 УК РФ. Данное правило квалификации автором предлагается закре пить на уровне Верховного Суда Российской Федерации с целью обеспечения единообразия право применительной практики</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="summary"><p>This article explores the problem of distinguishing between non-reporting of a crime and previously notpromised concealment of crimes. The author analyzes the criteria that make itpossible to distinguish between these crimes, aswell astheir relationship to each other. The conducted criminal legal characterization of the nopromise of secrecy regarding a crime and failure to report a crime itallowed us to conclude that these compounds have both similar and distinctive characteristics. The keydifferences are expressed in the fact that concealment is an action, non–communication is inaction, when a person has the duty and opportunity to report a crime. Based on historical precedent and the views of legal experts, a principle for the classification of crimes hasbeen established, which states that if a failure to report a crime and a promise to conceal a crime occur simultaneously and relate to a particularly serious offense included in the enumeration of acts set out in the provision of Article 205.6 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, such actions should be classified under Article 316 of the same code. The author proposes to consolidate this qualification rule at the level of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in order to ensure uniformity of lawenforcement practice</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>involvement in a crime</kwd><kwd>non-communication</kwd><kwd>concealment</kwd><kwd>notpromised in advance</kwd><kwd>connivance</kwd><kwd>complicity</kwd><kwd>qualification</kwd><kwd>competition</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>прикосновенность к преступлению</kwd><kwd>несообщение</kwd><kwd>укрывательство</kwd><kwd>заранее не обещанный характер</kwd><kwd>попустительство</kwd><kwd>соучастие</kwd><kwd>квалификация</kwd><kwd>конкуренция</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Baimurzin G.I. Responsibility for touching a crime under Soviet criminal law: Dis. cand. jurid. sciences. - M., 1966. - 279 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Baskhanov A.M. Promised failure to report a crime in advance: a doctrinal approach//Eurasian advocacy. – 2024. – № 3. - S. 56-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Wittenberg GB, Panchenko P.N. Touching a crime under Soviet criminal law: a textbook. - Irkutsk: IrSU, 1976. - 98 s. 315 ПРАВО и УПРАВЛЕНИЕ - № 1 - 2026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Klimenko, Yu.A. Failure to report a crime (Article 205.6 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): legal nature, relationship with conceal ment and complicity in terrorism//Actual problems of Russian law. – 2017. – № 9 (82). - S. 163-171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Kovalev M.I. Criminal liability for harboring crimes under Soviet criminal law: abstract. dis.... cand. jurid. sciences. M., 1952. - 20 s.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Moskalev G. L. Problems of criminal lawregulation of failure to report a crime (Article 205.6 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation )//Academic Legal Journal. – 2017. – № 3. - S. 21-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Trifonov V.G. Concealment of crimes. Prob lems of delimitation from related acts and complicity in a crime in the form of complicity//Scientific portal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. – 2016. – № 4 (36). - S. 30-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Dvorzhitskaya M.A. Responsibility for touch ing a crime in criminal law: dis.... cand. jurid. sciences. - St. Petersburg, 2019. 199 pp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">V.A. Zvetko. Criminal lawsignificance of the crime: dis.... cand. jurid. sciences. Krasnodar, 2020. 234 pp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Federal Law No. 13 dated June 1996, 63-FZ (asamended on April 06, 2024 )//NW RF. 1996. № 25. Art. 2954.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Verdict of the Cheryomushkinsky District Court of Moscow in a criminal case 1-188/2019// Official portal of the Courts of General Jurisdiction of the city of Moscow. URL: https://mos-gorsud.ru/ (access date: 12.01.2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Verdict of the Dzerzhinsky District Court of the Kaluga Region No. 1-26/2014//Judicial and regu latory decisions of the Russian Federation. URL: https://sudact.ru/ (access date: 12.01.2025); verdict of the Primorsky Regional Court in criminal case No. 2-25/2017 [Electronic resource ]//Judicial and regu latory decisions of the Russian Federation. URL: https://sudact.ru/ (access date: 12.01.2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the USSR of 31.07.1962 No. 11 “On judicial practice in cases of previously notpromised concealment of crimes, acquisition and sale of know ingly stolen property” (Expired )//Consultant Plus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_ doc_LAW_107352/ (access date: 12.01.2025).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
