Право и управление2224-913310.24412/2224-9133-2026-3-155-160OtherВОССТАНОВИТЕЛЬНОЕ ПРАВОСУДИЕRESTORATIVE JUSTICEБажановСергей АндреевичBazhanovSergey Andreevichsergey.bazhanov62@yandex.ruПырченковаГалина СтепановнаPyrchenkovaGalina Stepanovnagalapyrchenkova@mail.ruLeading Researcher of the Department for the Improvement, of Normative and Legal Regulation of the Activities, of the Penitentiary System of the Center for the Study, of Management Issues and the Organization of Penal Enforcement, in the Penitentiary System of the Federal Research Institute, of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federationведущий научный сотрудник отдела по совершенствованию, нормативно-правового регулирования деятельности уголовно-, исполнительной системы центра изучения проблем управления и, организации исполнения наказаний в уголовно-исполнительной системе, ФКУ НИИ ФСИН России, кандидат юридических наук, г. Москва, Российская ФедерацияAssociate Professor of the Foreign Languages, Department of the Academy of Management, of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professorдоцент кафедры иностранных языков, Академии управления МВД России, кандидат филологических наук, доцент1404202631551602003202614042026

Статья рассматривает восстановительное правосудие в качестве альтернативной формы уголовного правосудия, которая фокусируется на удовлетворении потребностей жертв и об щества, а также на обязанностях правонарушителя возместить причиненный вред наилучшим обра зом. Анализируются различия между восстановительным правосудием и возмездным правосудием, которое рассматривает правонарушителей исключительно в контексте нарушения закона. Исследуют сяцели и основные модели реализации восстановительного правосудия в зарубежной юридической практике. Выявлена тенденция растущего распространения восстановительного правосудия в каче стве альтернативной формы наказания в западной правовой системе. Автор приходит к выводу, что восстановительное правосудие исходит из общей для многих традиционных обществ предпосылки о взаимосвязи наших человеческих отношений, которая предполагает, что вред, причиненный одному, вредит всей сети отношений и обязывает нас ее восстановить

This article examines restorative justice as an alternative form of criminal justice that focuses on meeting the needs of victims and society, aswell as the offender’s obligation to make restitution to the best of their ability. Itanalyzes the differences between restorative justice and retributive justice, which considers offenders solely in the context of their violation of the law. The goals and main models of restorative justice implementation in international legal practice are explored. A trend toward the increasing application of restorative justice as an alternative form of punishment in western legal systems is identified. The author concludes that restorative justice is based on a premise common to many traditional societies about the interconnectedness of ourhuman relationships, which suggests that harm to oneperson harms the entire network of relationships and obligates us to restore it

возмездное правосудиеправовая системаальтернативная форма наказаниямедиациятюремное заключениевосстановительное правосудиеrestorative justiceretributive justicelegal systemalternative form of punishmentmediationimprisonmentHandbook on Restorative Justice Programs. – United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), March 2020. – 126 pp.Umbreit, M. S., Greenwood J., Fercello C., Umbreit J. National Survey of Victim–Offender Mediation Programs in the United States. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Victims of Crime, 2000.Umbreit, M. S. Family Group Conferencing: Implications for Crime Victims. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Victims of Crime, 2000.Umbreit, Mark S., and Jean Greenwood. 2000. Guidelines for Victim-Sensitive Victim–Offender 160 ПРАВО и УПРАВЛЕНИЕ - № 3 - 2026 Mediation: Restorative Justice Through Dialogue. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Victims of Crime, 2000.Behtz, S. A. Justice for All?: Victim Satisfaction with Restorative Justice Conferences. – Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004.Tinneke V. C., Wemmers J.-A. Victim satisfaction with restorative justice More than simply procedural justice. – International Review of Victimology 19 (2), 2013. – P. 117-143.Nugent, W. R., Paddock J. B. The Effect of Victim–Offender Mediation on Severity of Reoffense. – Mediation Quarterly 12 (4), 1995. – P. 353–367.McGarrell, Edmund F. Restorative Justice Conferences as an Early Response to Young Offenders. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2001.McGarrell, E. F., Olivare K., Kroovand N. Restorative Justice Conferences as an Early Response to Younger Offenders: Final Report on the Indianapolis Experiment. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, 2000.Braithwaite, John. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. –England: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Bazemore, G., Umbreit M. S. A Comparison of Four Restorative Conferencing Justice Models. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2001.Bazemore, G., Umbreit M. S. Balanced and Restorative Justice for Juveniles: A Framework for Juvenile Justice in the 21st Century. –Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 1997.Barrow G. Justice and Balance: Victim, Offender and Community Perspectives. – Probation in Europe, June 2003. // http://www.unicri.it/wwk/ documentation/probation/docs/Bulletin_27_E.pdf.Loffmann M., Morten F. Investigating Alternatives to Imprisonment Within Council of Europe Member States. – The Quaker Council for European Affairs, 2010.Elonheimo H. Restorative Justice Theory and the Finnish Mediation Practices. – Crime and Control in an Integrating Europe, 2003. // http://www. restorativejustice.org/10fulltext/elonheimo/view.Handbook on Restorative Justice Programs. – United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), March 2020. – 126 pp.Umbreit, M. S., Greenwood J., Fercello C., Umbreit J. National Survey of Victim–Offender Medi ation Programs in the United States. –Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Victims of Crime, 2000.Umbreit, M. S. Family Group Conferencing: Implications for Crime Victims. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Victims of Crime, 2000.Umbreit, Mark S., and Jean Greenwood. 2000. Guidelines for Victim-Sensitive Victim–Offender Mediation: Restorative Justice Through Dialogue. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Victims of Crime, 2000.Behtz, S. A. Justice for All?: Victim Satisfac tion with Restorative Justice Conferences. – Elec tronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004.Tinneke V. C., Wemmers J.-A. Victim satis faction with restorative justice More than simply procedural justice. – International Review of Victimology 19 (2), 2013. – P. 117-143.Nugent, W. R., Paddock J. B. The Effect of Victim–Offender Mediation on Severity of Reoffense. – Mediation Quarterly 12 (4), 1995. – P. 353–367.McGarrell, Edmund F. Restorative Justice Conferences as an Early Response to Young Offend ers. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2001.McGarrell, E. F., Olivare K., Kroovand N. Restorative Justice Conferences as an Early Response to Younger Offenders: Final Report on the Indianapolis Experiment. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, 2000.Braithwaite, John. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. –England: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Bazemore, G., Umbreit M. S. A Compari son of Four Restorative Conferencing Justice Mod els. – Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2001.Bazemore, G., Umbreit M. S. Balanced and Restorative Justice for Juveniles: A Framework for Juvenile Justice in the 21st Century. –Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 1997.Barrow G. Justice and Balance: Victim, Offender and Community Perspectives. – Probation in Europe, June 2003. // http://www.unicri.it/wwk/ documentation/probation/docs/Bulletin_27_E.pdf.Loffmann M., Morten F. Investigating Alter natives to Imprisonment Within Council of Europe Member States. – The Quaker Council for European Affairs, 2010.Elonheimo H. Restorative Justice Theory and the Finnish Mediation Practices. – Crime and Control in an Integrating Europe, 2003. // http://www. restorativejustice.org/10fulltext/elonheimo/view.